On 5/16/2011 6:44 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
By my observation, what is being done, satisfactorily meets the dictionary
definition of a whitelist. the term was uncontroversial in the dicussion
The working group is what statistical research methodology calls a biased
sample...
Will we be revising dkim rfc 4871 to explictly define whitelist as dns name
based whitelist thereby replacing the existing two usages of the term (which
involve explicitly allowing delivery on the basis of orign), or was the term
appraise in 2009 but not now?
how is non-normative discussion text in rfc 4871 relevant?
Perhaps that also means that all RFC references to cron are required to define
the term?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf