On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:35 PM, t.petch wrote:
It seems strange that this e-mail is not copied to the v6ops list.
I would have expected this first to have been hammered out on the v6ops list
and, if and only if consensus was reached there, the new text be then brought
to
the
IETF list.
I realise that, as you spell out, you are seeking IETF consensus but what is
that if the
WG is dead set against it?
The working group adopted the document without the statement. the IESG would
presumably provide instruction as to what to do next with the draft were they
to conclude that the compromise was considered acceptable by the community.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:30 PM
After some discussion, the IESG is attempting to determine whether there is
IETF consensus to do the following:
- add a new section to draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
- publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic as INFORMATIONAL
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will obsolete RFCs 3056 and 3068 and
convert
their status to HISTORIC. It will also contain a new section describing what
it
means for RFCs 3056 and 3068 to be classified as HISTORIC. The new section
will
say that:
- 6-to-4 should not be configured by default on any implementation (hosts,
cpe
routers, other)
- vendors will decide whether/when 6-to-4 will be removed from
implementations. Likewise, operators will decide whether/when 6-to-4 relays
will
be removed from their networks. The status of RFCs 3056 and 3068 should not be
interpreted as a recommendation to remove 6-to-4 at any particular time.
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will not update RFC 2026. While it
clarifies
the meaning of "HISTORIC" in this particular case, it does not set a precedent
for any future case.
Please post your views on this course of action by August 8, 2011.
Ron Bonica
<speaking
as OPS Area AD>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf