Tom,
Sorry. I meant to copy both lists. They are both copied now.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: t.petch [mailto:daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 2:36 PM
To: Ronald Bonica; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
It seems strange that this e-mail is not copied to the v6ops list.
I would have expected this first to have been hammered out on the v6ops
list
and, if and only if consensus was reached there, the new text be then
brought to
the
IETF list.
I realise that, as you spell out, you are seeking IETF consensus but
what is
that if the
WG is dead set against it?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:30 PM
After some discussion, the IESG is attempting to determine whether
there is
IETF consensus to do the following:
- add a new section to draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
- publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic as INFORMATIONAL
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will obsolete RFCs 3056 and 3068
and convert
their status to HISTORIC. It will also contain a new section describing
what it
means for RFCs 3056 and 3068 to be classified as HISTORIC. The new
section will
say that:
- 6-to-4 should not be configured by default on any implementation
(hosts, cpe
routers, other)
- vendors will decide whether/when 6-to-4 will be removed from
implementations. Likewise, operators will decide whether/when 6-to-4
relays will
be removed from their networks. The status of RFCs 3056 and 3068 should
not be
interpreted as a recommendation to remove 6-to-4 at any particular
time.
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will not update RFC 2026. While it
clarifies
the meaning of "HISTORIC" in this particular case, it does not set a
precedent
for any future case.
Please post your views on this course of action by August 8, 2011.
Ron Bonica
<speaking
as OPS Area AD>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf