Le 27/07/2011 21:25, Roger Jørgensen a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, John Mann
(ITS)<john(_dot_)mann(_at_)monash(_dot_)edu> wrote:
<snip>
[ And that native dual-stack is a replacement for both. ]
We want normal users to move past "experimental IPv6" towards "production
IPv6".
Exactly, we should focus on doing production IPv6, not wasting our
time on something that run on top of something else, whatever it's
called (are way too many to choice from already and I will recommend
anyone that ask me to never walk down that road, never).
So, can we please stop this never ending SPAMMING with regards to 6to4?
It is a total waste of time, really Keith, please stop. pretty please stop.
I believe 6to4 is useful dont make it historic without a clear
replacement strategy which is backwards compatible with installed base.
open source and no need to fill in forms on web pages.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf