On Sep 6, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
The document doesn't actually say out loud there that the requirements for
Proposed Standard have been considerably increased by IESG practice over the
years, nor does it charge subsequent IESGs to return to a faithful reading of
the actual text.
Is IESG really misreading "no known technical omissions with respect to the
requirements placed on it"?
If the bar has been raised since the publication of 2026, might this actually
be reasonable given that the Internet is much larger, more diverse, and more
hostile than it used to be?
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf