On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Joe Touch <touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu> wrote:
My claim is that:
SRVs represent services as they are currently assigned by IANA
a new RR could be useful for things that aren't sufficiently
expressible in the IANA service/port registry
Existence proofs show that this is not *actually* so. It's only what
RFC2782 was aiming for.
Time has passed. That ship has sailed.
Someone should update RFC2782 for the benefit of the community, but I
don't see how that could be a requirement here. Much less do I think
anything could preclude such an update.
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf