On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Andrew Feren wrote:
On Fri 16 Sep 2011 03:22:08 PM EDT, Keith Moore wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:07 PM, hector wrote:
I don't see these ass "Wikis" but basically "blog style" flat display of
user comments, which I often do find useful, especially for the user ("this
way") upon user ("not always") follow ups.
A Wiki is more where you can change the main content and perhaps even the
context. I don't think that is a good idea for RFCs.
I'm thinking in terms of a hybrid Wiki where the RFC content is static but
the discussion is maintainable as a Wiki and can be visually associated with
the RFC content. You'd also want the RFC content to be clearly
distinguished from the discussion.
Keith
Something like the annotate POD feature for perl modules on CPAN?
Example:
Unannotated
http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI-1.616/DBI.pm
Annotated
http://www.annocpan.org/~TIMB/DBI-1.616/DBI.pm
Yes, something like that.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf