On Sep 23, 2011 1:41 PM, "Brian E Carpenter"
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On 2011-09-23 17:21, Benson Schliesser wrote:
However, I would like to make sure we don't lose sight of the need
for some urgency with draft-weil.
I'm a little puzzled by the claim of urgency; I remember hearing in
July 2008 that doom was imminent if this was not done immediately.
I thought that the urgent issue was deploying IPv6.
On 2011-09-23 20:38, SM wrote:
...
I suggest that ARIN publishes its policy through the Independent Stream
and documents the IPv4 addresses that will be used for so-called shared
transition space.
What makes you think that the Independent stream would publish such an
RFC, which on the face of it would be a complete end-run around the
IETF process, and fly in the face of the IAB position?
+1
Additionally, this network operator and ARIN member is fully opposed to any
shared address draft. Real routable addresses are need for real routable
systems.
There is no free lunch, these efforts should be focused on making 240/4 work
or doing ipv6, not ripping of really working ipv4 space.
Both of the above are hard ... sorry.
Cb
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf