--On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:11 -0700 Dave CROCKER
<dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
On 10/12/2011 10:27 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
I was not picturing everyone adding their own conflicts.
However, I thought this might help us avoid some of the
issues we've had in the past, where obvious group-level
conflicts are omitted, and meetings have to be rescheduled at
the last moments.
I'll suggest a more distributed model:
Chairs circulate among their wg, the conflicts they believe
should be avoided. When that discussion settles down, the
chairs submit their set to ietf staff. IETF staff and ietf
main list are thereby spared the effort, but each set gets
review beyond the chairs.
Of course, some WGs / Chairs have been doing this, or variations
on it. for some years now. I'd venture that it works better in
some WGs than others... much like many other things.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf