RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
> Robin Whittle
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 3:07 AM
> To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> Subject: Re: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol
>
> Hi Masataka,
>
> I mean no offence.  I try to keep my messages brief,
[JD] 

This is a joke, right?

> and it would be
> tortuous to write "the LISP protocol" at every point in this
> discussion.
>
> In the context of the IETF, I think "LISP" means the protocol.  I was
> not discussing the LISP programming language at all.
>
>   - Robin
>
>
> On 29/10/2011 7:52 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> > Robin Whittle wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Luigi (and other LISP people),
> > As a member of the LISP people (I wrote an interpreter and
> > a compiler for 8080), your statement above is irritating.
> >
> >                                             Masataka Ohta
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf