Noel,
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 8:40 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu
Subject: RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol
> From: "Templin, Fred L"
<Fred(_dot_)L(_dot_)Templin(_at_)boeing(_dot_)com>
>> .. an LEID which is assigned to a virtual interface,
one which is created
>> _solely_ as a place to hold the system's identity ..
>> ...
>> .. a name which i) is purely identity, ii) has no
location info of
>> any kind in it, iii) cannot be used for forwarding
anywhere, etc, etc.
>>
>> Where in that list is any difference from a 'real' EID
(in the sense
>> of 'name for an end system')?
> My point is proven by the analogy I gave in the
previous iteration
I am still interested to hear if there is any effective
difference you can
point to?
You can't just refuse to engage in my analogy:
https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=60357&tid=1320334244
and then demand that I engage in yours.
Thanks - Fred
fred(_dot_)l(_dot_)templin(_at_)boeing(_dot_)com
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf