The assumption in my question is that if the legacy (broken?) gear in
question all uses 10/8 *and* we publish a document that declares a
particular (presently unused by said gear) block of 1918 address space
is henceforth off limits to use in equipment that can't translate when
addresses are identical on the outside and the inside, then the use of
that 1918 address space might be "safe" for CGNs to use.
might require a cpe change. about the same change as for the cpe to
recognize new/10 as non-public.
randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf