On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, David Conrad <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Frank,
On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
The last state I'm aware of is that the 240/4 addresses minus one
were and still are (RFC 5735) reserved for IETF experiments, did I miss
some newer IETF consensus about this?
...
<http://omniplex.blogspot.com/2008/06/lost-found-268435455-free-ips.html>
Does it actually matter? What RFCs say (or don't say) about 240/4 means
precisely nothing to the deployed, non-field-upgradable CPE that I understand
is driving the interest draft-weil.
That IMO is the rock that proposals to use Class E have floundered on.
There is a lot of gear out there that will not be able to
deal with any Class E internetworking protocol, little prospect that
that will be changed any time soon, and a general feeling that it is
unwise to spend limited resources changing this.
Regards
Marshall
Regards
Marshall
Regard,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf