ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

2011-12-05 12:32:09
Wes,

On Dec 5, 2011, at 10:02 AM, George, Wes wrote:
Independent of whether we have any left, continued support for IPv4 in the 
home and enterprise is *non-negotiable*,

True, however as I understand it, this isn't the issue.  IIUC, the problem 
isn't what happens in the home and enterprise, it is what happens on the WAN 
side of old non-upgradeable CPE when connected via CGNs.  

Saying that IPv6 is a solution to an IPv4 CGN implementation problem is like 
saying ...

I'm guessing part of the issue here is folks appear to be talking past each 
other.  It might be helpful to be explicit about what your view of the "IPv4 
CGN implementation problem" is. For example, IPv6 _could_ be a solution if both 
the CPE and the CGN supports IPv6 and a way to tunnel v4 through v6 (no idea if 
anyone does this).

Regards,
-drc


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>