Also, in general, we have operated on the basis that if people aren't
interested enough in a work item or draft to actually work on it or
review it, then the work item isn't really important to the community.
This even applies to drafts that I write, if nobody is interested ;-).
When all work items in the IETF reach that state, we can all get on
with our lives.
Regards
Brian
On 2011-12-21 05:38, Donald Eastlake wrote:
The end of year Holiday season is not generally known as a time when
lots of work gets done.
Thanks,
Donald
=============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e3e3(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:21 AM, t.petch <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com>
wrote:
.. I knew how to move things forward. Earlier this year, the discussion was
about how meetings might be reorganised to make more happen, and I commented
that six meetings a year - no need to attend them - might produce six spurts
of
activity in a 12 month period instead of three.
Post-Taipei, most of the WG I track, with the notable exception of the
terrible
twins of v6, seem to be moribund; WGLC go unanswered, calls for adoption lie
fallow, those edits that would be made as soon as the window opened again
remain
unmade, ...
The IESG is evidently working hard, but at the lower strata, ...
For Christmas, I wish ...
Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf