I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for
CGN
because there were too many conflicting usages. So, now we're making
more 1918
space? This is a good idea... how? If we need more 1918 space, let's do
so
deliberately, and not kill the usefulness of this space for CGN.
(Unless, of
course...)
Noel
+1 on this and Brian's comment.
While I still support this draft, the wording in section 4 is probably too
soft and reduces a lot the usefulness of this adressing space.
/JFT
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf