This is essentially correct. The apparent conceptual difference is that a
variable length address looks more like source routing. The end system owns
only a small part of the total address; the rest is the network portion,
fashioned to seem like a source route. Depending on how the address is
interpreted, the division of the network portion into routing steps will be
specified in advance or will be interpreted at each step. The latter alllows
gradual evolution of the network by consolidating small switches into larger
ones.
The transition to CIDR within IPv4 accomplished pretty much the same thing and
had the same benefits. Nonetheless, 32 bits just isn't enough. The only way
variable length address would have provided a smooth transition is if there had
been room to increase the length of the address after some years of use. Well,
if we had left room in the address field for more than 32 bits, we'd have had
the same advantage. But we didn't.
Steve
On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 15-Feb-12 08:42, Dave CROCKER wrote:
As I recall, there was essentially no experience with variable length
addresses -- and certainly no production experience -- then or even by
the early 90s, when essentially the same decision was made and for
essentially the same reason.[1]
It's not that variable length addressing is a bad idea; it's that it
didn't get the research work and specification detail it needed, for
introduction into what had become critical infrastructure. What I
recall during the IPng discussions of the early 90s was promotion of
the /concept/ of variable length addressing but without the
experiential base to provide assurance we knew how it would operate.
The problem with variable-length addressing that, in practice, one needs
to specify a maximum length. The result, therefore, is that you don't
have variable-length addresses at all but rather fixed-length addresses
with a shorthand encoding for unused bits.
S
--
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf