On 07/03/2012, at 1:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
To me, the target of that language is software that generically treats
protocol elements beginning with "x-" in a fundamentally different
way, without knowledge of its semantics. That is broken, causes real
harm, and I have seen it deployed.
clue bat please? is there any general semantic to X-?
I think one of the main points of the draft is to answer that question with
"no."
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf