Hi Med,
At 08:05 25-04-2012, mohamed(_dot_)boucadair(_at_)orange(_dot_)com wrote:
Med: Do you mean, cite RFC4291 in addition to the ref to Appendix A.2?
Yes, and have Appendix A.2 as informative.
Med: Yes, because as listed in Appendix A.2, we wanted to have an a
prefix in the ff3x::/32 range.
You are using a "must". It might be interpreted differently.
Med: We first considered a "MUST" but we relaxed that required to
"SHOULD" for any future use case which may need to map IPv4 ASM to
IPv6 SSM. Does this makes sense to you?
Yes.
Med: It should be "for IANA allocation" instead of "to IANA". Better?
There is no mention of that in the IANA Considerations section. The
range is already reserved for SSM destination addresses. I am at a
lost on that part of the text. I'll defer to you on this.
Well, you tried your best.
Regards,
-sm