Hi Jacni,
Thanks for the feedback.
At 08:32 26-04-2012, Jacni Qin wrote:
Maybe adding a quick explanation following it will make it better?
If it's a requirement, you could use "MUST". You are using the RFC
2119 key words in the previous and following bullet points to specify
the requirements.
Right, that's why we think there is no need to mention that again.
Sorry, I'm a little confused. or I misunderstood what you mean? ;-)
If one reads the text, it's not clear whether the range is being
reserved or not.
BTW, Med followed up on this.
Regards,
-sm