I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: (Proposed RFC 6478) (was draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10)
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2012-04-26
IETF LC End Date: 2012-04-30
**** Note: This draft has previously been approved as RFC 6478, but I
understand we are last calling it again due to some material changes in AUTH48.
Therefore this is a review of the diff between revision 10 and the text at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6478.txt ****
Summary:
The edited text is essentially ready for publication, but I have a couple of
minor issues that might should be considered first.
Major issues:
None
Minor issues:
-- 5.3, last paragraph:
The last sentence changed from a non-normative statement to "This SHOULD cause
the PE sending the PW status notification message with a PW status code equal
to zero to stop sending and to continue normal operation."
Is that really intended as a normative statement, or a statement of fact? I
suspect it's the latter, but if the former, then it should be stated more of
the form "If the sending PE receives ... it SHOULD stop ..."
-- IANA considerations:
Maybe I missed it, but I don't see a registration policy for adding things to
the new registry. This wasn't an AUTH48 change, but it should probably be there.