Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-07

On Jul 3, 2012, at 14:24, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I found it is to be odd to have a requirements document as a BCP, but I am 
> sure
> you can sort the right status out with IESG.
+1

I fail to see why Informational wouldn't be the better status.

Lars

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature