ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Version Notification for: draft-baryun-rfc2119-update-00.txt

2012-08-01 11:28:26
+1 to Barry, well said.

On 01/08/2012, at 9:03 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org> 
wrote:

I written this draft starting a RFC2119 update for the reasons of
discussion threads in [1] and [2]. Please check draft and feedback,
thanking you.

I agree with what Paul and Melinda have said.  This document is pointless, as 
there is no actual problem that it's solving and no misunderstanding that 
it's clarifying.  Further, it's actively *harmful*.  It's arguable that 2119 
already reserves too many words by giving them specific, normative meanings 
(SHALL *and* MUST; SHOULD *and* RECOMMENDED).  Adding IF, THEN, and ELSE 
would not only be unnecessary, but downright *bad*.

Barry 

--
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>