Yes but that's an editing issue. Go look at how process documentation
and state machines are handled in serious protocol RFCs. Some do use
if/then in a formal way, but some are just informative. The purpose
of 2119 is clarity of terminology.
That is good when they use, I seen thoes, but how can we use
terminology so that don't collide, some people use 2119 terms that are
not condition, to describe conditions.
Everyone knows what "if" and
"then" mean - your concern is how they are used.
Yes my concern is how/when use terms not meaning of terms. Ok, What
about "MUST" (every one know it), wasn't it clear as "if then", please
explain why capital?
The way to fix that
is in the particular drafts you have an issue with.
I did put that in one draft already as you say and one participant
before suggest. but I am thinking for the future works and to make the
authors document the specification they implemented more efficiently
without using 2119 terms in conditional and
I thank you for your comments, your email will be more concsidered,
AB