ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Version Notification for: draft-baryun-rfc2119-update-00.txt

2012-08-02 03:19:33
Hi SM,

Thanks for your comments, I will note your feedback and follow to read
into these issues as you advise, thanking you,

Best Regards
AB
======

On 8/1/12, SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:
At 11:19 AM 8/1/2012, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
Yes my concern is how/when use terms not meaning of terms. Ok,  What
about "MUST" (every one know it), wasn't it clear as "if then", please
explain why capital?

You are probably receiving feedback on your draft because the WG
sessions this week are boring. :-)  The is a thread about "all caps"
at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg73338.html  I
suggest reading RFC 1122 and RFC 1123 to get a view of how some
specifications were written and why they were written in such a way.

Melinda Shore provided some good advice (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg74191.html ).  I
would not say that your draft is not helpful.  It is up to you to
assess whether draft-baryun-rfc2119-update-00 can gain IETF Consensus.

Regards,
-sm



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>