ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

2012-09-13 14:43:10

I was only peripherally involved in this and don't know all the in's and outs 
of this but let me try and provide a bit of information and hopefully someone 
from the IETF Trust or RFC Editor can correct me where I am wrong. 

The internet draft was done with the normal boiler plate that granted a bunch 
of rights to the IETF Trust. There was also text in the draft where the authors 
granted additional rights.  The trust normally publishes the RFC with about the 
same license that is used in the draft however the Trust retains the rights to 
do whatever they want within the range of the license granted to them in the 
draft. In this case, the RFC was published with slightly different boiler plate 
than what was in draft. 

So no, I don't think the policy has changed, and no I don't think this was a 
mistake. I think the RFC Editor working with the IETF Trust and IETF legal 
advice made this change. My understanding of the reasons for the change was 
something like this makes it easier for some linux distribution to include the 
RFC with their distribution or something. Keep in mind this is a weird RFC in 
that it includes a huge amount of normative code in the RFC. 

Hope this helps - and amazed anyone noticed. 

Cullen

PS - I may have this all wrong - I'm not the person that knows but I hope that 
provides some help. 
On Sep 13, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Simon Josefsson <simon(_at_)josefsson(_dot_)org> 
wrote:

All,

I noticed that the recent RFC 6716 contains some reference code that
contain the copyright and licenses notice reproduced below.  The IETF
TLP [1] mandates a certain form of copyright notices and the TLP does
not, as far as I can see, permit varying the boiler plate in any way.
Note that both companies and organisations are mentioned in the
copyright notice in RFC 6716, besides individuals.

Does this indicate a policy change, a mistake with that document, or
something else?

Btw, kudos to the RFC 6716 authors for shipping reference code!  I hope
this will establish a best practice for standards in the future.

/Simon

[1] 
http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/IETF-Trust-License-Policy-20091228.htm

Copyright 1994-2011 IETF Trust, Xiph.Org, Skype Limited, Octasic,
                   Jean-Marc Valin, Timothy B. Terriberry,
                   CSIRO, Gregory Maxwell, Mark Borgerding,
                   Erik de Castro Lopo. All rights reserved.

This file is extracted from RFC6716. Please see that RFC for additional
information.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:

- Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

- Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

- Neither the name of Internet Society, IETF or IETF Trust, nor the
names of specific contributors, may be used to endorse or promote
products derived from this software without specific prior written
permission.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER
OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>