ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: WCIT outcome?

2013-01-03 03:56:04
It's really not that simple. If it were all the world would be doing it for 
everything.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris(_dot_)dearlove(_at_)baesystems(_dot_)com | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, 
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
Sent: 03 January 2013 08:40
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: WCIT outcome?

----------------------! WARNING ! ----------------------
This message originates from outside our organisation,
either from an external partner or from the internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters
for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
--------------------------------------------------------

Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:

Given the ever increasing number of mobile devices, one could argue that the 
world
has never been more dependent on radio spectrum allocation.

If you don't insist on allocating fixed bandwidths, CSMA/CA takes care 
of most of issues.

                                                Masataka Ohta

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>