IETF Discussion (date)
January 31, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Randy Bush, 23:15
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Dave Crocker, 20:32
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Donald Eastlake, 19:42
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Barry Leiba, 18:26
- Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, SM, 10:56
- Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 08:45
- Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, t.p., 06:14
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Abdussalam Baryun, 05:48
January 30, 2013
- Re: Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols', SM, 18:32
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Dave Crocker, 12:36
- Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], SM, 12:19
- RE: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 06:15
- When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Adrian Farrel, 03:16
January 29, 2013
- Re: 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC), Barry Leiba, 20:32
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Spencer Dawkins, 15:35
- Re: 3933 experiments, Dave Crocker, 13:11
- Re: 3933 experiments, Stephen Farrell, 12:33
- 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC), SM, 11:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Dave Crocker, 10:14
- Premature termination of IETF last call on draft-farrell-ft, Adrian Farrel, 09:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Thomas Narten, 08:40
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?, Ben Laurie, 05:16
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?, Ben Laurie, 04:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 04:00
January 28, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 23:06
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?, =JeffH, 16:42
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Joe Touch, 09:24
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 05:13
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:55
January 27, 2013
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Joe Touch, 22:28
- Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?, John Levine, 14:22
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Eliot Lear, 13:18
- Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?, Brian Haberman, 09:28
- IPv6 update for BCP5?, tglassey, 09:07
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 05:51
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, t.p., 05:22
January 25, 2013
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Martin Rex, 20:20
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:48
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Martin Rex, 15:36
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, t.p., 12:06
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 11:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC, Carol Davids, 10:48
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 10:37
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 09:46
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 09:35
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Eliot Lear, 09:31
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 09:27
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Eliot Lear, 07:37
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 07:08
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05, Ben Laurie, 05:17
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Loa Andersson, 04:54
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 04:30
- RE: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 04:25
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC, t.p., 04:06
January 24, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Joe Touch, 20:00
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Allison Mankin, 19:57
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Joe Touch, 18:20
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Fernando Gont, 18:13
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Martin Rex, 17:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC, Matt Mathis, 16:35
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), ned+ietf, 15:26
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Joe Touch, 13:36
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John C Klensin, 12:34
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 10:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-08.txt> (Methodology for Benchmarking SIP Networking Devices) to Informational RFC, Robert Sparks, 10:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC, Robert Sparks, 10:05
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Carsten Bormann, 03:38
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Carsten Bormann, 03:23
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Dave Cridland, 02:15
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Fernando Gont, 00:59
January 23, 2013
- Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03, Yakov Shafranovich, 22:58
- Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03, Yakov Shafranovich, 22:37
- Re: CRLF, Pete Resnick, 21:51
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Dale R. Worley, 21:42
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Randy Presuhn, 20:19
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), John C Klensin, 19:21
- TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03, Allison Mankin, 18:33
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), John C Klensin, 18:09
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), John Day, 17:05
- Re: A modest proposal, Dale R. Worley, 17:00
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), Dale R. Worley, 16:58
- Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), John Day, 16:56
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), David Morris, 16:46
- Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)), Carsten Bormann, 16:29
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), John Day, 16:19
- Re: [IETF] A modest proposal, John C Klensin, 16:18
- Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), Hector Santos, 15:37
- Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 14:49
- Re: [IETF] A modest proposal, Tony Finch, 14:08
- CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal), John C Klensin, 13:57
- Re: [IETF] A modest proposal, Warren Kumari, 12:45
- Re: A modest proposal, Michael Richardson, 12:15
- Re: A modest proposal, Tony Finch, 11:40
- Re: A modest proposal, joel jaeggli, 11:01
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Thomas Narten, 08:12
- Re: A modest proposal, Hannes Tschofenig, 03:27
- Re: A modest proposal, Brian E Carpenter, 01:58
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06, Peter Yee, 01:10
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-00, Peter Yee, 00:52
- Re: A modest proposal, John Levine, 00:16
January 22, 2013
- Re: A modest proposal, Melinda Shore, 22:45
- Re: A modest proposal, Dean Willis, 22:16
- Re: A modest proposal, joel jaeggli, 22:15
- Re: A modest proposal, Dean Willis, 22:01
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:47
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:36
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:12
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?, =JeffH, 15:45
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Thomas Narten, 15:31
- Re: A modest proposal, John Levine, 13:21
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John Leslie, 13:04
- Re: A modest proposal, t.p., 12:06
- Re: A modest proposal, joel jaeggli, 12:02
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 11:40
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Joe Touch, 11:15
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 11:01
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Joe Touch, 10:40
- Re: A modest proposal, Janet P Gunn, 10:29
- Re: A modest proposal, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 10:03
- Fwd: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-86, Eggert, Lars, 08:54
- Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt, Elwyn Davies, 08:13
- Re: A modest proposal, Johnny Eriksson, 05:10
- The Implemetation and Running Code MAY be tested [RFC2026], Abdussalam Baryun, 05:08
- Re: A modest proposal, William Jordan, 04:19
- Re: A modest proposal, William Jordan, 04:11
- Re: A modest proposal, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:05
- Re: A modest proposal, t.p., 04:00
- Re: A modest proposal, Melinda Shore, 03:49
- Re: A modest proposal, Hannes Tschofenig, 02:35
- Re: A modest proposal, David Morris, 01:39
- Re: A modest proposal, Melinda Shore, 01:24
- Re: A modest proposal, Carsten Bormann, 01:22
- Re: A modest proposal, Melinda Shore, 01:06
January 18, 2013
- Beta testing of xml2rfc version 2, IETF Chair, 20:49
- IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013, IETF Administrative Director, 13:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 13:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard, Fernando Gont, 12:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC, Benoit Claise, 10:09
January 17, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 19:10
- Bits-N-Bites Sponsors Needed for Orlando, IETF Chair, 16:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, ned+ietf, 12:25
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing, Eric Burger, 07:07
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06, Magnus Westerlund, 04:59
January 16, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01.txt> (Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf") to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:22
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00, Ben Campbell, 16:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 15:24
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 14:00
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Huub van Helvoort, 04:18
January 15, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, ned+ietf, 21:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 17:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, ned+ietf, 17:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC, Sam Aldrin, 12:59
- GenART LC review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07, Roni Even, 12:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC, Benoit Claise, 08:49
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, John C Klensin, 08:18
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 08:03
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, John C Klensin, 08:02
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 07:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 07:15
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 05:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 05:33
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 05:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 04:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 03:43
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Brian E Carpenter, 02:02
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Dean Willis, 00:19
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Dean Willis, 00:16
January 14, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Martin Rex, 20:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Olafur Gudmundsson, 16:29
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Hanna, 16:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 16:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC, SM, 16:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard, SM, 15:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 15:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC, Martin Rex, 15:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Martin Rex, 14:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing), 14:30
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:23
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Lee Howard, 13:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John Leslie, 12:53
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, David Conrad, 12:19
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 12:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 12:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 11:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC, Benoit Claise, 11:08
- Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Hector Santos, 11:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Olafur Gudmundsson, 10:39
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 10:07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Barry Leiba, 09:55
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin, 09:19
- Re: [therightkey] Fwd: Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC, Ben Laurie, 08:39
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 08:38
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 08:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 07:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, John Leslie, 07:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephan Wenger, 05:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 04:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephan Wenger, 04:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 03:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 03:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephan Wenger, 03:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 03:33
- Fwd: [irtf-discuss] New: Software-Defined Networking Research Group (SDNRG), Eggert, Lars, 03:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Eggert, Lars, 03:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 03:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephan Wenger, 01:51
January 12, 2013
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Randy Bush, 23:01
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, David Conrad, 22:27
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Randy Bush, 21:15
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 18:34
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, David Conrad, 18:20
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Randy Bush, 17:49
- RE: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Bernard Aboba, 16:48
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin, 16:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 13:45
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, David Conrad, 13:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 12:33
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, S Moonesamy, 12:24
- draft-moonesamy-mail-list-protocol-00, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:50
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:45
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 03:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Eggert, Lars, 03:35
January 11, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, SM, 16:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 15:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephan Wenger, 15:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Stephen Farrell, 14:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, SM, 14:00
- FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC, Adrian Farrel, 10:22
January 10, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing, Michael Richardson, 19:16
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing, tglassey, 16:04
- Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing, Dale R. Worley, 15:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC, SM, 11:34
January 09, 2013
- Orlando IETF Codesprint, IETF Chair, 17:29
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Joe Touch, 11:58
- Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05, Ben Laurie, 10:05
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Hector Santos, 07:05
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Martin Rex, 03:15
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Martin Rex, 02:46
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 02:17
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 02:09
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:03
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 01:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard, SM, 01:31
January 08, 2013
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 22:38
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Dick Franks, 20:47
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 19:29
- RE: travel guide for the next IETF..., Stephen Hanna, 19:28
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Ralph Droms, 19:06
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Marc Petit-Huguenin, 19:02
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Dean Willis, 18:57
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Martin Rex, 18:36
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 18:00
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Dean Willis, 17:54
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Dean Willis, 17:39
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 13:01
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 12:58
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 12:57
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 12:15
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Jared Rosoff, 12:14
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 11:59
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Jared Rosoff, 11:53
- RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Gregory Mirsky, 11:30
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Jared Rosoff, 11:29
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Matthew Morley, 11:29
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Paul C. Bryan, 11:28
- RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, neil.2.harrison, 11:27
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Greg Mirsky, 11:27
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Greg Mirsky, 11:26
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Conal Tuohy, 11:24
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 11:08
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 10:19
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 09:55
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Donald Eastlake, 09:13
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 08:45
- Re: [radext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-07.txt> (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise, 08:05
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Dick Franks, 07:42
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 05:54
- Re: Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012, SM, 05:31
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Glen Zorn, 05:07
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Loa Andersson, 05:02
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Huub van Helvoort, 04:17
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Markus Lanthaler, 04:14
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, t.p., 04:06
- Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012, Eliot Lear, 03:53
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 02:19
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 01:58
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 00:33
January 07, 2013
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 22:48
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 22:40
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John C Klensin, 21:42
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, John Day, 21:03
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John Levine, 20:57
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, John Levine, 20:30
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 20:09
- Compliance to a protocol description? (wasRE: I'm struggling with 2219 language again), Robin Uyeshiro, 19:41
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, C. M. Heard, 19:02
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Thomas Narten, 15:47
- Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Huub van Helvoort, 15:35
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 15:07
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Scott Brim, 14:49
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Riccardo Bernardini, 14:40
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Dean Willis, 14:19
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, ned+ietf, 10:31
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Paul C. Bryan, 10:27
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Matthew Morley, 10:26
- Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???, Dale R. Worley, 10:20
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 10:18
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], ned+ietf, 10:01
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Scudder, 09:51
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Pete Resnick, 09:34
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 08:49
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Brian E Carpenter, 07:31
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Stewart Bryant, 06:43
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 06:28
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Stewart Bryant, 04:54
January 06, 2013
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], John Day, 22:50
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John Levine, 20:26
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 19:15
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 18:02
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Ole Jacobsen, 16:31
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Michael Richardson, 16:14
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Abdussalam Baryun, 15:07
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 06:09
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:02
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Abdussalam Baryun, 02:41
January 05, 2013
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 23:59
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 23:26
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 22:56
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 22:21
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 21:00
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 20:30
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 19:48
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell, 19:32
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard, Robert Sayre, 18:19
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Melinda Shore, 16:54
- A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again], Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:14
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Hector Santos, 10:37
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, John C Klensin, 10:03
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Eliot Lear, 08:32
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson, 03:13
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:09
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:04
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:00
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:55
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson, 02:44
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson, 02:39
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:37
- Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:31
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Ole Jacobsen, 02:25
- Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:22
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Yoav Nir, 02:14
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Glen Zorn, 00:27
January 04, 2013
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John Levine, 22:52
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Glen Zorn, 22:44
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Hector Santos, 21:25
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, ned+ietf, 19:17
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Randy Bush, 18:47
- Re: Acoustic couplers, Dale R. Worley, 18:42
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Ted Hardie, 18:03
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Ole Jacobsen, 17:18
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Mark Nottingham, 16:53
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Mark Nottingham, 16:49
- Re: More cache control for (X)HTML pages, Mark Nottingham, 16:47
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Thomas Narten, 16:24
- More cache control for (X)HTML pages, Nathan, 16:21
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Yoav Nir, 16:15
- RE: WCIT outcome?, SM, 16:13
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Ben Campbell, 15:59
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Tony Hain, 15:46
- Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun, 14:51
- Re: meaning RFC 2119 (was Re:I'm struggling with 2219 language again), Abdussalam Baryun, 14:33
- meaning RFC 2119 (was Re:I'm struggling with 2219 language again), Abdussalam Baryun, 14:26
- [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Kent, 13:20
- RE: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Adrian Farrel, 13:19
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Richard Barnes, 13:05
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Patrik Fältström, 12:56
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Hector Santos, 12:37
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:15
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Scott Brim, 12:05
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Bob Braden, 11:57
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Ted Hardie, 11:25
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Huub van Helvoort, 10:30
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 10:18
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Richard Barnes, 08:47
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Lou Berger, 07:24
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Dave Cridland, 03:58
- Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Randy Bush, 02:42
- Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Brian E Carpenter, 02:02
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Ole Jacobsen, 01:55
- Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???, Mahmoud Emam, 01:12
- Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???, Mahmoud Emam, 01:06
January 03, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- I'm struggling with 2219 language again, Dean Willis, 23:15
- RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Ronald Bonica, 21:42
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Tony Hain, 19:00
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11, Ben Campbell, 17:39
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 12:49
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dale R. Worley, 11:01
- Re: Acoustic couplers, Steve Crocker, 10:40
- Re: Acoustic couplers, John C Klensin, 09:36
- Re: Acoustic couplers, John C Klensin, 09:23
- Re: Acoustic couplers (was: WCIT outcome?), Janet P Gunn, 09:18
- Re: Acoustic couplers, Steve Crocker, 09:09
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 08:54
- Re: Acoustic couplers, Dave Crocker, 08:53
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:29
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Carlos M. Martinez, 07:50
- Re: Acoustic couplers (was: WCIT outcome?), John C Klensin, 07:48
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 07:41
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 07:22
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 07:16
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Carlos M. Martinez, 06:52
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 06:13
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 03:56
- Re: WCIT outcome?, t.p., 03:48
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Masataka Ohta, 02:41
- Re: [IETF] WCIT outcome?, Patrik Fältström, 01:00
January 02, 2013
- Acoustic couplers (was: Re: WCIT outcome?), ned+ietf, 21:35
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John Levine, 17:15
- Re: WCIT outcome?, SM, 17:08
- Re: [IETF] WCIT outcome?, Warren Kumari, 16:22
- Re: WCIT outcome?, David Morris, 16:16
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dave Crocker, 16:08
- Re: WCIT outcome?, ned+ietf, 15:57
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., John C Klensin, 15:37
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Livingood, Jason, 15:20
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dale R. Worley, 13:51
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Donald Eastlake, 12:44
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Noel Chiappa, 11:59
- RE: WCIT outcome?, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 11:34
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06, Bitar, Nabil N, 10:56
- Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 10:56
- Re: travel guide for the next IETF..., Michael Richardson, 10:55
- Re: [ih] 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Paul Vixie, 10:54
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dmitry Burkov, 10:53
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:30
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 08:49
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Stewart Bryant, 08:29
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:15
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Carlos M. Martinez, 07:45
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 07:19
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 06:39
- Re: WCIT outcome?, SM, 06:34
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Brian E Carpenter, 03:03
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Victor Ndonnang, 02:24
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Randy Bush, 01:03
January 01, 2013
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Fred Baker (fred), 23:12
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 19:12
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:29
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Jaap Akkerhuis, 16:14
- LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05, =JeffH, 15:51
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dave Crocker, 13:08
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 12:52
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Dave Crocker, 12:47
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Alessandro Vesely, 12:36
- Re: WCIT outcome?, John Day, 12:34
- Re: WCIT outcome?, Brian E Carpenter, 02:31
- Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP, Abdussalam Baryun, 02:22