Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers

On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

Otherwise I think there needs to be better definition of what it meansto "implement" or "support" an RFC when it comes to completness and whatthis means as per following SHOULD and MAY.


Also what it means following things in it that is not RFC2119 language.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson <= Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Melinda Shore Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Mikael Abrahamsson Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, John C Klensin Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Dean Willis Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, John C Klensin Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers, Hector Santos