Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers

As an operator, I purchase equipment and need to write RFQs. I would like 
to able to ask more than "does the product implement RFC <whatever>", I 
want to also ask "Please document all instances where you did not follow 
all MUST and SHOULD, and why".
Otherwise I think there needs to be better definition of what it means to 
"implement" or "support" an RFC when it comes to completness and what this 
means as per following SHOULD and MAY.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se