ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]

2013-01-09 02:09:50
might preference would be just to pick one, and
provide a stick for hitting those who do it the other way.

I think that IESG is already using that stick :)

AB

On 1/9/13, Dean Willis <dean(_dot_)willis(_at_)softarmor(_dot_)com> wrote:

On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Abdussalam Baryun 
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:

but the question of
error in process is; does the RFC lack communication requirement with
the community?


Sorry if not clear. I mean that as some participant are requesting a
scientific approach to struggling with 2119 (i.e. thread-subject),
does that mean in some RFCs the use or not use (i.e. we see that
participant use different approaches to follow the 2119) that it may
add communication confuse with some of community?


I'm absolutely certain that some of our community is confused about
something related to this thread. Given the absence of information that
would help in a decision, might preference would be just to pick one, and
provide a stick for hitting those who do it the other way.

--
Dean




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>