Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

On 02/01/13 20:34, "Abdussalam Baryun" <abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
allegedly wrote:

> I recommend that IETF WGs consider start an initial historical I-D
> including their memories of important process or design of protocols,
> at least each 20 years WG participants could document their technical
> involvement history within WG work.
>
> AB
What?  How about RFC 5218?

This is done all the time through the WG process, and it changes all the
time too, which is appropriate.