On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:17 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 2/2/13, Scott Brim <swb(_at_)internet2(_dot_)edu> wrote:
What? How about RFC 5218?
This is done all the time through the WG process, and it changes all the
time too, which is appropriate.
Many WG open and close in IETF with no history-ID/report of such
efforts including success or failur issues. If documents produced, new
generation can benefit from these IDs
AB
+1
5218 is a general document; I believe what AB suggested is a historical record
specifically for each WG: what you started with, what you went through, how you
ended, what you have learned, both principles and lessons.
Lixia