From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Dave Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:06 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Remote Participation Services
[WEG] changed subject line to reflect actual topic
If a meeting has good structure, management and content, the presence or
absence of slides doesn't matter.
[WEG] Perhaps it would be helpful to make an informal recommendation to WG
chairs (via the wiki, for example) that generally they should carve each
request for agenda time roughly in half, with a hard limit of $speaker_time/2
devoted to "presenting" or otherwise framing the discussion and the remaining
time devoted to open mic discussion. Likely this will result in presenters
asking for 2x their previous time, but at least it will be a more realistic
method to plan out time during a meeting and reduce the instances where the WG
will be running short of time for meaningful discussion if the presenter (or WG
chair) isn't good at managing the available time and spends the whole
allocation reading slides to the people in attendance.
Wes George
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.