On 6/10/2013 4:52 PM, Bradner, Scott wrote:
etter than saying "I have not read the document but I support publication"
I do not see all that much help in having someone list reasons they support
publication unless
there is some particularly wonderful feature or the prose is particularly clear
the reverse is not the case, I think there is real value in someone saying in
detail why the do not support
publication of a document
Content free statements of support turn the public query into a pure
popularity contest and/or a game of personal authority. Is your support
more important than Pete's non-support? Absent substance in the
statements, we've no idea how to evaluate any disparity.
Statements that include substance about the nature and technical
adequacies are a form of showing one's work on an exam: they demonstrate
the substance that is the basis the support, not just the fact of it.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net