Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
There is one thing that as far as I can tell that all the implementors agree
on. None of the implications control the resolution using
m=video 62537 RTP/SAVPF 96
a=rtpmap:96 VP8/90000
a=fmtp:96 max-fr=30;max-fs=3600
What resolution do you think "max-fs=3600" is? I have no idea. It is not
possible to implement so it is not surprising no one is doing it. However, this
draft-ietf-payload-vp8 draft says the resolution is specified using the max-fs and max-fr.
I can't speak for other implementations, but here at Mozilla, our
interpretation of RFC 6236 was that the values specified in imageattr
can be completely ignored by either side, if they so choose. That leaves
max-fs and max-fr as the only mechanism to indicate a resource
constraint that cannot be ignored, and we plan to use it as such.
See <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=881935> for details.