Re: pgp signing in van

On Sep 9, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Paul Wouters <paul(_at_)nohats(_dot_)ca> wrote:

Related (does not take away the full pain):


Nice.   I think section 4.2 is slightly too pessimistic, but not harmfully so.  
 It might be worth talking about leap-of-faith validation as well as 
web-of-trust validation.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: not really pgp signing in van, (continued) Re: not really pgp signing in van, Ted Lemon Re: not really pgp signing in van, Yoav Nir was: not really pgp signing in van, SM Re: was: not really pgp signing in van, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: not really pgp signing in van, Theodore Ts'o Re: not really pgp signing in van, Måns Nilsson Re: pgp signing in van, Arturo Servin Re: pgp signing in van, Ted Lemon Re: pgp signing in van, Fernando Gont Re: pgp signing in van, Paul Wouters Re: pgp signing in van, Ted Lemon <= Re: pgp signing in van, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: pgp signing in van, Scott Kitterman Re: pgp signing in van, Theodore Ts'o Re: pgp signing in van, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: pgp signing in van, Joe Touch