On 10/14/2013 02:39 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Is there a way to decouple this discussion from draft-ietf-6man-
oversized-header-chain? I would be glad to discuss it in the context of
a separate draft.
I don't know if there is a way to decouple it. I believe I have shown
a way to not mess up tunnels while at the same time not messing up your
draft. That should be a win-win. In what way would imposing a 1K limit
on the IPv6 header chain not satisfy the general case?
6man had consensus multiple times on *not* to impose this sort of limits
in this document (that's why the original limit of 1280 bytes was
removed from earlier versions of this I-D in the first place).
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont(_at_)si6networks(_dot_)com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492