This I-D specifies an IANA entry with
server-generated-key | [RFC-ietf-pkix-est] Section 4.4.2 |
with a note to
replace RFC-ietf-pkix-est in the table above with the RFC number
assigned to draft-ietf-pkix-est.
Should this be RFC7030?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>;
<smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:44 PM
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
consider
the following document:
- 'Creation of a registry for smime-type parameter values'
<draft-leiba-smime-type-registry-01.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-11-28. Exceptionally, comments
may
be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) defined the
Content-Type parameter "smime-type". As the list of defined values
for that parameter has increased, it has become clear that a
registry
is needed to document those values. This document creates that
registry, registers the current values, and specifies the policies
for registration of new values.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-smime-type-registry/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-smime-type-registry/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.