Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Information

On 11/4/13 7:52 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

For me, "rough consensus" and "running code" should be taken
together, not independently. I've always taken it as "rough consensus
OF THOSE WITH running code".


Larry, that is awesome!

/psa

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Larry Masinter Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre <= Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Ted Lemon Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Ted Lemon Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Martin Rex RE: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Larry Masinter Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun RE: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Larry Masinter Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Randy Presuhn

Re: Last Call: <C> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC