On Nov 30, 2013 7:55 AM, "Melinda Shore"
<melinda(_dot_)shore(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 11/30/13 4:45 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
And if the problem is that bad, that it's impossible to reach
consensus in the WG, what about replacing the chairs? ...
Not for failure to gain consensus, by any means. "No consensus,
do nothing" is a legitimate (if frustrating) outcome. I think
they showed really questionable judgment in calling for a vote
and laying out eligibility criteria, and for me that's a huge issue
(congratulations, guys - just like that you changed us into a
member organization) but failure to gain consensus is a valid
outcome.
Melinda
+1 that no consensus means no MTI. Because of IPR restrictions, we cant
have nice things.
Regarding voting, I am a voting member, what are the rules of conduct? May
I sell my vote? EBay?
http://m.ebay.com/itm/310623399083?nav=SEARCH&sbk=1