Cullen,
On 5 Dec 2013, at 16:56, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Given the hum in the IETF plenary at the last IETF, I no longer think this
document represents IETF consensus. Given the hum in RTCWeb working group, I
doubt this represents the consensus of the RAI area either.
I think I would be tempted to resolve this by saying for each different
scenario RTP is used in (SIP, RTSP, Mulitcast etc) exactly how it needs to be
secured and for scenarios not listed such as new usages, what the
requirements are. For something like SIP, having just one way to secure RTP
is much better than having many ways.
I'm confused about your objection, since this draft states that we need to do
exactly as you propose.
Colin
--
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/