jiankang,
i agree it is interesting. and that is why we have spent the last ten years on
extending the internet to space, and running ietf protocols in space.
http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/cleo
http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/dtn
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: Jiankang Yao [yaojk(_at_)cnnic(_dot_)cn]
Sent: 30 December 2013 09:42
To: Abdussalam Baryun; Wood L Dr (Electronic Eng)
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: Re: Chang'E 3
it is a interesting topic. ietf protocols may be extended to space.
________________________________
Jiankang Yao
From: Abdussalam Baryun<mailto:abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Date: 2013-12-28 06:31
To:
l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk<mailto:l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
CC: mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca<mailto:mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: Chang'E 3
I was discussing/commenting on the subject as the thread did about using space
internet protocols on satellites, still no standards for space.
AB
On Friday, December 27, 2013, wrote:
AB
The Moon is arguably a satellite of Earth, but the distances are different from
LEO and GEO. That affects TCP performance.
TCP was designed with geostationary satellite hops in mind - see eg RFC829. I
use TCP across geostationary satellites daily.
I back up my statements with experience and references. What do you back yours
with? Why is UDP inefficient?
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: Abdussalam Baryun [abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<javascript:;>]
Sent: 27 December 2013 06:01
To: Wood L Dr (Electronic Eng)
Cc: mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca<javascript:;>;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<javascript:;>
Subject: Re: Chang'E 3
So if TCP has problems then MPTCP has problems then they may not be preferred
for that satellite networking. For LEO SATNETs also there are problems for
using TCP. The UDP is a good solution in general but not efficient, but always
I think the SATNETs may need some special internet transport protocols because
they are having more dynamics in the net's lower layers.
AB
AFAIK vanilla ftp/TCP has (only?) been used on CHIPsat from LEO, but that did
not have much data to transfer.
We designed http://saratoga.sf.net with the idea of a continuous UDP stream of
data from Pluto in mind...
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<javascript:;><javascript:;>] On
Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
[abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<javascript:;><javascript:;>]
Sent: 26 December 2013 16:40
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<javascript:;><javascript:;>
Subject: Chang'E 3
Transport protocol for satellites depend on the applications, the network
dynamics, links and transmission channels. IMO the use of MPTCP for Back2Earth
may not be the best option making the communication complex, not sure why did
you hope to use it with this project.
AB