ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice

2014-01-02 09:47:08

<l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:
    >> I don't think it's a problem that a draft gets adopted as a WG item
    >> that is incomplete in a variety of ways, including security
    >> considerations.
    >>
    >> Let's not continue the trend to having a WG design team prior to
    >> having a WG.

    > perpass is not a WG, and draft-farrell-perpass-attack is not an adopted
    > WG item.

I think that Melinda is making a general statement about WG processes, not
one related to perpass.  Perhaps I'm wrong here.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting for hire =-


Attachment: pgpA3rZsOrkQd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>