Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG)
2014-01-09 10:06:13On Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:59:08 PM Stewart Bryant wrote:
I would be interested in what operators are observing in their network, because I have never heard a concern expressed that this was happening.
You mean for native MPLS, or for encapsulated MPLS? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
| Previous by Date: | Re: Multi-homed BCP38, Patrik Fältström |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft, Mark Tinka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft (was: RE: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG), Stewart Bryant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp was RE: gre-in-udp draft, Stewart Bryant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |