RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet Number

Hi Russ,

Thanks for this. The -03 revision just posted addresses my comments.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com]
> Sent: 25 January 2014 16:39
> To: adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk
> Cc: IETF
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-number-registries-02.txt> (Internet
> Numbers Registries) to Informational RFC
>
> Adrian:
>
> > Section 2.1 says...
> >
> >   Reservations of special-purpose AS Numbers are made through Internet
> >   Standards actions.
> >
> > Section 2.2 says...
> >
> >   Reservation of special-purpose IPv4 addresses are made through
> >   Internet Standards actions.
> >
> > Section 2.3 says...
> >
> >   Reservation of special-purpose IPv6 addresses are made through
> >   Internet Standards actions.
> >
> > Section 3 says...
> >
> >   "IETF Review" as defined in [RFC5226] is required to reserve special-
> >   purpose AS numbers, IPv4 addresses, or IPv6 addresses.
> I will post -03 soon.  It uses "IETF Review" throughout.
>
> > 1. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 should have a reference to 5226
> Fixed.
>
> > 2. Section 3 contradicts 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3.
> Fixed.
>
> > 3. Why is Section 3 present since there are no instructions for IANA?
> Based on the suggestion from David Conrad, Section 3 now asks IANA to
establish
> a registry for special-purpose AS numbers.
>
> Russ