ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Engineering discussions (was Re: a radical idea)

2014-03-09 16:29:15
from [heasley] [Permanent Link] 
Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:10:27AM +0000, Dave Crocker:

The phrasing of your suggestion presumes that you are currently 
prevented from having those discussions.  But of course you aren't.


I believe the point is to separate general technical discussion from the
general everything else discussion, such as the draft-how-not-to-be-a-
wanker discussion, so that those here just for the technical aspects of
IETF need not wade through it.  Which I support.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Juliao Braga
Next by Date:  Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, t.p.
Previous by Thread:  Engineering discussions (was Re: a radical idea), Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:  Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Abdussalam Baryun
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]