Everyone,
For those who don't know, Daniel Migault is one of our two appointed
IETF liaisons to the Technical Liaison Group (TLG) for ICANN. The other
is Warren Kumari. Thanks Daniel for these pointers, and thanks both of
you for your service.
Eliot
On 3/26/14, 4:22 AM, Daniel Migault wrote:
Hi,
For those who wants to have the complete session, audio
<http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-iana-accountability> and
transcripts
<http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-iana-accountability/transcript-iana-accountability-24mar14-en>
are online.
BR,
Daniel
[AUDIO] http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-iana-accountability
[TRANSCRIPT]
http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-iana-accountability/transcript-iana-accountability-24mar14-en
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:44 PM, John Curran <jcurran(_at_)istaff(_dot_)org
<mailto:jcurran(_at_)istaff(_dot_)org>> wrote:
On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
<mailto:abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>
wrote:
On Monday, March 24, 2014, IAB Chair wrote:
Today at ICANN 49 in Singapore, process to develop an
Internet community plan was launched. Since the announcement
by NTA just over a week ago, discussions have been taking
place in many hallways and mail lists. Input from the all of
the community discussions needs to be gathered, and ICANN has
provided a mail list for this purpose:
ianatransition(_at_)icann(_dot_)org. An archive is available so that
everyone can see the collection of prior postings to the
list: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ianatransition/.
ICANN needs to encourage discussions not just make a list and
think community people will do directly.
AB -
As far as I can tell, this phase is simply an expedited call for
input on the cross-community
process and timeline that is to be used for IANA transition plan
development - specifically,
the entire community is being asked to comment on the presentation
of process and timeline
that ICANN (as the USG NTIA designated process convener) provided
in Singapore -
<http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-iana-accountability/presentation-iana-accountability-24mar14-en>
Amongst other things, that presentation asks the following framing
questions regarding the
IANA transition plan development process -
- What are the most important principles?
- What mechanisms are important to ensure a well-run process?
It also notes a fairly large list of ICANN, IETF, and RIR meetings
occurring between now and
September 2015, although how community discussion and
cross-community synthesis of inputs
appears to be a completely open question (and hence particularly
ripe for community input now)
The goal is to gather the input by 27 March 2014,
That is short time, I suggest icann postpones the goal date. I
don't see many inputs (only 3 or 4) on the list of icann,
It is incredibly short timeframe, but it's also important to get
back comments on the proposed
timeline and process, integrate those into a draft, and get that
out for comment by 7 April so
that it can be finalized, since it is only upon completion of all
that we'll be able to utilize the
resulting development process and have some discussions of the
actual content of the IANA
Transition Plan.
For example, if you feel that there should be just one global
mailing list for the IANA transition
plan development with continuous synthesis of all input, or one
discussion in each community
each via their processes; or that we should use one global
wiki-based plan document editing
facility, or have an appointed steering committee to synthesize
inputs between communities,
or that there should be only a few selected face-to-face meetings
where we do open forum for
cross-community integration of positions, or that we should
generate initial draft IANA transition
plan text via a random number generator, or for that matter _any_
other process suggestions
regarding the IANA transition plan development, now is the time to
get those submitted asap...
As noted above, once ICANN integrates the received input on the
development process into a
draft document, it will go out to a formal consultation on or
about 7 April, so there will definitely
be an opportunity to respond to all of the process input at that
time. That is why if you feel that
a particular process or mechanism should be used to develop the
IANA Transition plan, it is
crucial to submit it by 27 March so that the entire
cross-community set of participants will see
it in the 7 April draft process/timeline document.
(This is probably far more information about this process for
input than anyone actually wanted
to hear, but given the extremely tight timelines, I figured that
is better to write down everything
we can discern about it from being here onsite at the ICANN
meeting...)
FYI,
/John
Disclaimer: My views alone. Not responsible for errors and
omissions - any resulting IANA
from this process is purely the responsibility
of the participants.
--
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58