On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Miles Fidelman
<mfidelman(_at_)meetinghouse(_dot_)net
wrote:
A more pragmatic, less expensive, and publicly visible expression of IETF
displeasure might be to expunge all versions of the offending I-D from IETF
document store and refuse to publish any subsequent version until the
unwarranted claims made for it are retracted.
To be effective, that needs to be done now, while the iron is still hot;
not after the usual 3-month email debate about the diplomatic niceties.
The later, accompanied with a strong statement about the limits of
DMARC, and the flaws in its deployment - might not be a bad start.
What real-world effect is this supposed to have, apart from setting a very
dangerous precedent?
-MSK