On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Dick Franks <rwfranks(_at_)acm(_dot_)org>
wrote:
1) Invalidates the inappropriate document citations on DMARC site.
I think you give them more weight than is justified.
2) Publicly refutes any claim that this is an IETF standardisation effort.
Any such claim is merely outdated and needs correction. DMARC did seek
standardization, but it was effectively denied.
Robust action in defence of IETF reputation is possibly a precedent worth
setting.
I suggest the price of going about it the way you described will do far
more harm than good, for reasons Brian has already cited.
-MSK